Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
JAMA2018Vol. 319(4), pp. 388–388
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2018 papers
Matthew D. F. McInnes, David Moher, Brett D. Thombs, Trevor A. McGrath, Patrick M. Bossuyt, and the PRISMA-DTA Group, Tammy Clifford, Jérémie F. Cohen, Jonathan J Deeks, Constantine Gatsonis, Lotty Hooft, Harriet Hunt, Christopher Hyde, Daniël A. Korevaar, Mariska Leeflang, Petra Macaskill, Johannes B. Reitsma, Rachel Rodin, Anne WS Rutjes, Jean‐Paul Salameh, Adrienne Stevens, Yemisi Takwoingi, Marcello Tonelli, Laura Weeks, Penny Whiting, Brian H Willis
Abstract
The 27-item PRISMA diagnostic test accuracy checklist provides specific guidance for reporting of systematic reviews. The PRISMA diagnostic test accuracy guideline can facilitate the transparent reporting of reviews, and may assist in the evaluation of validity and applicability, enhance replicability of reviews, and make the results from systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies more useful.
Related Papers
- → Establishment of a clinician-led guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of Hirayama disease using a modified Delphi technique(2020)66 cited
- → Directions in Delphi developments: Dissertations and their quality(1986)82 cited
- → An analysis of prior delphi applications and some observations on its future applicability(1977)35 cited
- → Applications of the Delphi method in China(1990)12 cited
- → A Delphi Study of Regional Industrial Land-Use(1977)4 cited