Distinct Optoelectronic Signatures for Charge Transfer and Energy Transfer in Quantum Dot–MoS2 Hybrid Photodetectors Revealed by Photocurrent Imaging Microscopy
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2018 papers
Abstract
Abstract Atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) have intriguing nanoscale properties like high charge mobility, photosensitivity, layer‐thickness‐dependent bandgap, and mechanical flexibility, which are all appealing for the development of next generation optoelectronic, catalytic, and sensory devices. Their atomically thin thickness, however, renders TMDCs poor absorptivity. Here, bilayer MoS 2 is combined with core‐only CdSe QDs and core/shell CdSe/ZnS QDs to obtain hybrids with increased light harvesting and exhibiting interfacial charge transfer (CT) and nonradiative energy transfer (NET), respectively. Field‐effect transistors based on these hybrids and their responses to varying laser power and applied gate voltage are investigated with scanning photocurrent microscopy (SPCM) in view of their potential utilization in light harvesting and photodetector applications. CdSe–MoS 2 hybrids are found to exhibit encouraging properties for photodetectors, like high responsivity and fast on/off response under low light exposure while CdSe/ZnS–MoS 2 hybrids show enhanced charge carrier generation with increased light exposure, thus suitable for photovoltaics. While distinguishing optically between CT and NET in QD–TMDCs is nontrivial, it is found that they can be differentiated by SPCM as these two processes exhibit distinctive light‐intensity dependencies: CT causes a photogating effect, decreasing the photocurrent response with increasing light power while NET increases the photocurrent response with increasing light power, opposite to CT case.
Related Papers
- → Fabrication of Self-Powered Fast-Response Ultraviolet Photodetectors Based on Graphene/ZnO:Al Nanorod-Array-Film Structure with Stable Schottky Barrier(2017)129 cited
- → Boosting Photocurrent via Heating BiFeO3 Materials for Enhanced Self‐Powered UV Photodetectors(2019)91 cited
- → Synchronous Enhancement for Responsivity and Response Speed in In2Se3 Photodetector Modulated by Piezoresistive Effect(2019)36 cited
- → Experimental comparison between Nb2O5- and TiO2-based photoconductive and photogating GFET UV detector(2023)13 cited
- → Enhanced Responsivity of Photodetectors Realized via Impact Ionization(2012)26 cited