Comparative studies of glycolytic pathways and channeling under in vitro and in vivo modes

Citations Over Time

Abstract

This study constructed cell‐free glycolytic enzyme systems and compared them to their in vivo functions in Escherichia coli . Under in vitro conditions, flux regulation followed enzyme concentrations and kinetics. In E. coli, only one of the isozymes of phosphofructokinase (PfkA) and fructose‐bisphosphate aldolase (FbaA) facilitate Embden‐Meyerhof‐Parnas (EMP) flux, but under in vitro assays, these isozymes were interchangeable. Additionally, in vitro introduction of the Entner–Doudoroff (ED) pathway improved glycolysis rates, while in vivo overexpression of the ED pathway could not capture significant flux unless its phosphotransferase system (PTS) was knocked out. Lastly, in vivo dynamic 13 C‐experiments revealed that the labeling order of EMP pathway intermediates was not strictly cascade, indicating intracellular metabolites were not well mixed. These enigmatic observations cannot be fully explained by thermodynamics or substrate level regulations. This article supports the long‐time conjecture that EMP enzymes are channeled, and the PTS may be an anchor point to initiate enzyme assemblies. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 65: 483–490, 2019

Related Papers

• → Isozyme-specific modules on human aldolase A molecule. Isozyme group-specific sequences 1 and 4 are required for showing characteristics as aldolase A.(1993)15 cited
• → Role of isozyme group-specific sequence 4 in the isozyme-specific properties of human aldolase C(1998)2 cited
• → Aldolase C in Brain Tumour(1969)16 cited
• → Location and primary structure of the substrate binding site peptide of aldolase C(1975)10 cited
• [Serum aldolase isozymes in tumor-bearng rats].(1968)