Review of estimates of the global burden of injury and illness due to occupational exposures
American Journal of Industrial Medicine2005Vol. 48(6), pp. 491–502
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2005 papers
Abstract
The CRA estimates of burden due to individual risk factors appear appropriate for the limited number of exposures and conditions included, but are a major underestimate of the overall number of work-related deaths at a global level due to exclusion of risk factors because of data limitations. Improvements in global estimates are likely to come from the use of different methodologies and improvements in the availability and use of local data.
Related Papers
- → The Australian Burden of Disease Study: measuring the loss of health from diseases, injuries and risk factors(2000)346 cited
- → THE PREVALENCE AND BURDEN OF MENTAL AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS IN ROMANIA: FINDINGS FROM THE GLOBAL BURDEN OF DISEASE STUDY 2016(2019)10 cited
- Updated Estimates of Burden Due to Mental and Substance Use Disorders from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013(2015)
- → The Burden of Breast Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study.(2024)
- National Burden of Eye Diseases in Iran 1990-2010; Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010(2014)