Calibrating software reliability models when the test environment does not match the user environment

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2002 papers

Abstract

Abstract Software failures have become the major factor that brings the system down or causes a degradation in the quality of service. For many applications, estimating the software failure rate from a user's perspective helps the development team evaluate the reliability of the software and determine the release time properly. Traditionally, software reliability growth models are applied to system test data with the hope of estimating the software failure rate in the field. Given the aggressive nature by which the software is exercised during system test, as well as unavoidable differences between the test environment and the field environment, the resulting estimate of the failure rate will not typically reflect the user‐perceived failure rate in the field. The goal of this work is to quantify the mismatch between the system test environment and the field environment. A calibration factor is proposed to map the failure rate estimated from the system test data to the failure rate that will be observed in the field. Non‐homogeneous Poisson process models are utilized to estimate the software failure rate in both the system test phase and the field. For projects that have only system test data, use of the calibration factor provides an estimate of the field failure rate that would otherwise be unavailable. For projects that have both system test data and previous field data, the calibration factor can be explicitly evaluated and used to estimate the field failure rate of future releases as their system test data becomes available. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Papers

• → Software Reliability(1990)25 cited
• → A Review of Software Reliability Testing Techniques(2021)3 cited
• → Parametric Software Reliability Growth Model with Testing Effort: A Review(2021)3 cited
• → Software Reliability Measurement Use Software Reliability Growth Model in Testing(2005)2 cited
• On the Study of Software Reliability in Quality Testing Metrics(2006)