Present Bias and Everyday Self‐Control Failures: A Day Reconstruction Study
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2017 papers
Abstract
Abstract Everyday life is full of self‐control problems. The economist's favorite explanation for self‐control problems is present bias. This paper tests whether experimentally elicited present bias predicts self‐control problems in everyday life. We measure present bias by using a standard incentivized delay discounting task and everyday self‐control by using the day reconstruction method (DRM). Because this is the first study to measure everyday self‐control by using the DRM, we also validate the method by showing that its data replicate key results from the seminal Everyday Temptation Study. We find that present bias does not predict everyday self‐control. This points to a distinction between decreasing impatience (as measured in delay discounting tasks) and visceral influences (as occurring in everyday life) as determinants of self‐control problems. We argue that decision making research can benefit from the DRM as a cost‐effective tool that complements lab and field experiments to better understand economic preference measures and their correlates in everyday life decision making. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Related Papers
- → Further comparison of 5-trial adjusting delay and probability loss tasks over a wide range of amounts(2018)5 cited
- → Contrived motivating operations alter delay-discounting values of disordered gamblers(2016)10 cited
- → Are there gender differences in delay discounting of monetary losses?(2021)4 cited
- → Comparing rapid assessments of delay discounting with real and hypothetical rewards in children(2019)8 cited
- → Measuring State Changes in Delay Discounting: The Experiential Discounting Task(2004)