The paradox of functional heterochromatin
BioEssays2004Vol. 27(1), pp. 29–41
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2004 papers
Abstract
Although heterochromatin has been studied for 80 years, its genetic function and molecular organization have remained elusive. In almost all organisms, heterochromatin has been regarded as genetically inactive chromosome regions. However, from genetic and genomic studies in Drosophila melanogaster and other organisms including humans, it is now clear that transcriptionally active domains are present within constitutive heterochromatin. These domains contain essential coding genes whose expression during development ensures the formation of the proper biochemical and morphological phenotypes, together with several gene models defined by genome annotation whose functions still need to be determined.
Related Papers
- → Mouse Heterochromatin Adopts Digital Compaction States without Showing Hallmarks of HP1-Driven Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation(2020)306 cited
- → M32, a murine homologue of Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), localises to euchromatin within interphase nuclei and is largely excluded from constitutive heterochromatin(1996)93 cited
- → Recruitment of heterochromatin protein 1 to DNA repair sites(2009)63 cited
- → Heterochromatin protein 1 binds transgene arrays(1998)92 cited
- → Human Chromosomal Q-heterochromatin Regions as a System(2022)