Reducing Ambiguity in the Functional Assessment of Problem Behavior

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2014 papers

Abstract

Severe problem behavior (e.g., self-injury and aggression) remains among the most serious challenges for the habilitation of persons with intellectual disabilities and is a significant obstacle to community integration. The current standard of behavior analytic treatment for problem behavior in this population consists of a functional assessment and treatment model. Within that model, the first step is to assess the behavior-environment relations that give rise to and maintain problem behavior, a functional behavioral assessment. Conventional methods of assessing behavioral function include indirect, descriptive, and experimental assessments of problem behavior. Clinical investigators have produced a rich literature demonstrating the relative effectiveness for each method, but in clinical practice, each can produce ambiguous or difficult-to-interpret outcomes that may impede treatment development. This paper outlines potential sources of variability in assessment outcomes and then reviews the evidence on strategies for avoiding ambiguous outcomes and/or clarifying initially ambiguous results. The end result for each assessment method is a set of best practice guidelines, given the available evidence, for conducting the initial assessment.

Related Papers

• → Noncontingent reinforcement for the treatment of severe problem behavior: An analysis of 27 consecutive applications(2017)73 cited
• → Clarifying inconclusive functional analysis results: Assessment and treatment of automatically reinforced aggression(2015)28 cited
• → FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF VERBAL BEHAVIOR: A BRIEF REVIEW(2013)17 cited
• → COMMENTS ON FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES FOR SCHOOL‐BASED BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS(1994)54 cited
• → The Evolution of Functional Analysis(2021)1 cited