One-year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis
British journal of surgery2017Vol. 104(10), pp. 1382–1392
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2017 papers
SCANDIV Study Group, Johannes Schultz, Conny Wallon, Ljiljana Blecic, Håvard Mjørud Forsmo, Joakim Folkesson, Pamela Buchwald, Hartwig Kørner, Fredrik A. Dahl, Tom Öresland, Sheraz Yaqub, András Papp, U Ersson, Tilman T. Zittel, Niklas Fagerström, David Gustafsson, G. Dafnis, Marise Cornelius, Monika Egenvall, P O Nyström, Ingvar Syk, Dadi Vilhjalmsson, Gunnar Arbman, Abbas Chabok, Merete Helgeland, Johan Bondi, Anders Husby, Ronny Helander, Ava Kjos, Hilde Gregussen, Aras Jamal Talabani, G. Tranø, IngridE. Nygaard, Gro Wiedswang, O. Sjö, Kari F Desserud, Stig Norderval, Mads Vikhammer Gran, Torkel Pettersen, Anne Kjersti Sæther
Abstract
The advantages of laparoscopic lavage should be weighed against the risk of secondary intervention (if sepsis is unresolved). Assessment to exclude malignancy (although uncommon) is advised. Registration number: NCT01047462 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Related Papers
- → Management of Colonic Diverticulitis Tailored to Location and Severity: Comparison of the Right and the Left Colon(2016)35 cited
- → The Limited Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnostic Process of Colonic Diverticulitis(2013)33 cited
- → Chronic diverticulitis of the large intestine characterized by stenosis symptoms in Japan: report of 6 cases(2012)2 cited
- → When To Hospitalize for Diverticulitis(1968)6 cited
- → Diverticula, diverticulosis and diverticulitis of the colon(1961)5 cited