Randomized clinical trial of pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection—long term results
British journal of surgery2005Vol. 92(5), pp. 547–556
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2005 papers
C Seiler, Markus Wagner, T. Bachmann, C. Redaelli, Bruno M. Schmied, Waldemar Uhl, Helmut Frieß, M.W. Büchler
Abstract
Both procedures were equally effective for the treatment of pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Pylorus-preserving Whipple resection offers some minor advantages in the early postoperative period, but not in the long term.
Related Papers
- → From Classic Whipple to Pylorus Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Ultimately to Pylorus Resecting - Stomach Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Review(2023)2 cited
- Current status of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma.(1989)
- [Pancreaticoduodenectomy--Whipple's operation--for periampullary cancer in patients over 70 years of age].(1999)