Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer
British journal of surgery2005Vol. 92(10), pp. 1195–1207
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2005 papers
Abstract
Laparoscopic repair seems better than open repair for low-risk patients. However, limited knowledge about its benefits and risks compared with open repair suggests that the latter, more familiar, approach may be more appropriate in high-risk patients. Further studies are needed.
Related Papers
- → Serial Analgesic Consumptions and Predictors of Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia with Cluster Analysis(2015)11 cited
- → Animal pharmacology of oxapadol (MD 720111), a new non-narcotic analgesic(1980)7 cited
- Formulation and screening of analgesic activity of different analgesic gel preparations.(2019)
- → Diagnostic laparoscopy in primary infertility(1984)3 cited
- Analgesic activities of some commonly used analgesics and analgesic mixtures in animal experiments.(1978)