Systematic review of tibial nerve stimulation to treat faecal incontinence
British journal of surgery2014Vol. 101(5), pp. 457–468
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2014 papers
Abstract
PTNS and TTNS result in significant improvements in some outcome measures; however, TTNS was not superior to sham stimulation in a large, adequately powered, RCT. As no adequate RCT of PTNS versus sham has been conducted, conclusions cannot be drawn regarding this treatment.
Related Papers
- → Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials comparing short-term results of laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resection(2007)10 cited
- Methodological and ethical quality in phase III--breast cancer trials.(2009)
- A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on Acupuncture for Shoulder Pain Based on Jadad Scale and revised STRICTA recommendations(2012)
- → Can We Really Trust the Findings of the COVID-19 Research? Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published on COVID-19(2022)1 cited
- → Evaluation of randomized controlled trials in the studies of clinical nutrition(2009)