Mid-term cost-effectiveness analysis of open and endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
British journal of surgery2014Vol. 101(3), pp. 225–231
Citations Over TimeTop 13% of 2014 papers
Abstract
There was no significant difference in reintervention rates after EVAR or open repair for rAAA. EVAR was as cost-effective at mid-term follow-up. The increased procedural costs of open repair are not outweighed by greater surveillance and reintervention costs after EVAR.
Related Papers
- → PCV30 COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR (EVAR) FOR ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM (AAA) IN SPAIN(2008)
- A Retrospective Review of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) with Home-made Devices(2007)
- → Factors Affecting 8-Year Mortality in the Endovascular Era of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair(2020)
- → TCT-399: Long-term Results Of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Versus Open Repair In Patients With Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Results Of The UK EVAR Trial 1(2010)