Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions2016Vol. 88(6), pp. 934–944
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2016 papers
Abdur Rahman Khan, Sobia Khan, Haris Riaz, Faraz Khan Luni, Herman Simo, Aref Bin Abdulhak, Chirag Bavishi, Michael P. Flaherty
Abstract
In this meta-analysis we found that TAVR may be an acceptable alternative to SAVR in patients with intermediate risk for surgery. However, we must await evidence from the current large randomized trials before widespread adoption of this procedure is undertaken. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Related Papers
- → Bleeding Complications After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement(2013)189 cited
- → Systematic review/Meta-analysis Coffee consumption and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis(2012)44 cited
- → Combined carotid endarterectomy and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Technique and outcomes(2018)9 cited
- → Prophylactic Aortic Valve Replacement in Older Patients for Mild Aortic Stenosis During Coronary Bypass Surgery(2003)12 cited
- → Successful emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the setting of hemodynamically unstable prosthetic aortic valve stenosis(2022)1 cited