Incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation following treatment with the repositionable Lotus™ transcatheter aortic valve
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions2016Vol. 90(1), pp. 147–154
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2016 papers
Sarah Zaman, Liam McCormick, Robert Gooley, Hashrul Rashid, S. Ramkumar, Damon Jackson, Samuel Hui, Ian T. Meredith
Abstract
Almost a third of Lotus valve recipients require pacemaker implantation within 30 days. The presence of pre-existing RBBB and the depth of prosthesis implantation below the NCC were significant pacing predictors. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Related Papers
- → Hemodynamic performance and outcome of percutaneous versus surgical stentless bioprostheses for aortic stenosis with anticipated patient–prosthesis mismatch(2013)19 cited
- → Assessment of consistency in aortic valve sizing between surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement(2023)3 cited
- Long term clinical results with 19 mm or 21 mm standard aortic St. Jude Medical prosthesis.(1994)
- → Surgical aortic valve replacement for stenosis of TAVI device(2017)1 cited
- → Immediate results of aortic valve replacement in elderly and senile patients using the Ozaki technique and Perceval S seamless biological prosthesis(2023)