Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions2017Vol. 91(2), pp. 203–212
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2017 papers
Partha Sardar, Amartya Kundu, Michelle Bischoff, Saurav Chatterjee, Theophilus Owan, Ramez Nairooz, Jay Giri, Michael E. Halkos, Henry Liberman, John S. Douglas, Debabrata Mukherjee
Abstract
HCR appears to be safe, and has similar outcomes when compared with conventional CABG. HCR can be a suitable alternative to conventional CABG in select patients with MVCAD. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Related Papers
- → 5-Year Mortality Rate in Patients with Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction in Relation to Early Diagnosis(1988)20 cited
- → Erratum: The Practice Pattern of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Korea: Based on Year 2014 Cohort of Korean Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (K-PCI) Registry(2017)1 cited
- → Measuring the incidence of acute myocardial infarction: the problem of possible acute myocardial infarction(1988)12 cited
- → Clinical analysis of 26 patients with atypical myocardial infarction(2011)