Optimizing hemodynamics of transcatheter aortic valve‐in‐valve implantation in 19‐mm surgical aortic prostheses
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions2017Vol. 92(3), pp. 550–554
Citations Over Time
Jayendrakumar S. Patel, Amar Krishnaswamy, Jonathon White, Stephanie Mick, José Navia, Anand Mehta, Faisal G. Bakaeen, Zoran Popović, Lars G. Svensson, Samir Kapadia
Abstract
Good hemodynamic outcome is possible with aggressive post-dilation in patients with 19 mm failed surgical bioprostheses. High-risk patients with 19 mm failed surgical prostheses who do not otherwise have viable surgical options should be considered for ViV TAVR.
Related Papers
- → Bleeding Complications After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement(2013)189 cited
- → The Evolving Role of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the Era of Transcatheter Valvular Procedures(2023)13 cited
- → Relationship Between Hospital Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Volume and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes(2020)24 cited
- → Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Impact of patient‐prosthesis mismatch on outcomes(2022)5 cited
- → Surgical Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch on Outcomes(2022)