Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention results in reduced ischemic myocardium and improved outcomes
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions2018Vol. 92(4), pp. 692–700
Citations Over Time
Abhishek C. Sawant, Aishwarya Bhardwaj, Kinjal Banerjee, Yash Jobanputra, Arnav Kumar, Parth Parikh, Krishna Kandregula, Kanhaiya L. Poddar, Stephen G. Ellis, Ravi Nair, John Corbelli, Samir Kapadia
Abstract
Compared with angiography-guided PCI, FFR-guided PCI results in less repeat revascularization and a lower incidence of post PCI ischemia translating into improved survival, without an increase in complications.
Related Papers
- → What are the causes of a suboptimal FFR after coronary stent deployment? Insights from a consecutive series using OCT imaging(2018)51 cited
- Clinical study of different treatment strategy for AMI patients treated by primary PCI with multi-vessel coronary artery disease(2009)
- → Trends and Outcomes in the Use of Adjunctive Fractional Flow Reserve From a Large Multi-Centre PCI Registry(2023)
- → Abstract 161: National Trends in Use of Radial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China: 2001-2011(2015)