Outcomes in patients with peripheral vascular disease following percutaneous coronary intervention
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions2019Vol. 94(4), pp. 588–597
Citations Over TimeTop 11% of 2019 papers
J. Ramzy, Nick Andrianopoulos, L. Roberts, Stephen J. Duffy, David Clark, A. Teh, Andrew E. Ajani, Christopher M. Reid, Angela Brennan, Melanie Freeman, On behalf of the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG)
Abstract
PVD is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. PVD patient who received DES had improved outcomes compared with those receiving BMS.
Related Papers
- → Adoption of Radial Access and Comparison of Outcomes to Femoral Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(2013)463 cited
- → Recent advances in percutaneous coronary intervention(2020)154 cited
- → Impact of Gender on Elective and Non-Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(2007)
- → Abstract 161: National Trends in Use of Radial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China: 2001-2011(2015)