Outcomes of intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography guided percutaneous coronary angiography: A meta regression‐based analysis
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions2021Vol. 99(1), pp. E1–E11
Citations Over TimeTop 18% of 2021 papers
Yasar Sattar, Aminah Abdul Razzack, Ritika Kompella, Noora Alhajri, Junaid Arshad, Waqas Ullah, Mohamed Zghouzi, Tanveer Mir, David Power, Waqas Qureshi, Wael AlJaroudi, Islam Y. Elgendy, Mamas A. Mamas, M. Chadi Alraies
Abstract
In this meta-analysis, OCT-guided PCI was associated with no difference in clinical outcomes compared with IVUS-guided PCI.
Related Papers
- → Adoption of Radial Access and Comparison of Outcomes to Femoral Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(2013)463 cited
- → Prospective Validation that Vulnerable Plaque Associated with Major Adverse Outcomes Have Larger Plaque Volume, Less Dense Calcium, and More Non-Calcified Plaque by Quantitative, Three-Dimensional Measurements Using Intravascular Ultrasound with Radiofrequency Backscatter Analysis(2013)17 cited
- Clinical study of different treatment strategy for AMI patients treated by primary PCI with multi-vessel coronary artery disease(2009)
- → Abstract 161: National Trends in Use of Radial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China: 2001-2011(2015)