Real‐life data from standardized preanalytical coding (SPREC) in tissue biobanking and its dual use for sample characterization and process optimization

Citations Over Time

Abstract

The standardized preanalytical code (SPREC) aggregates warm ischemia (WIT), cold ischemia (CIT), and fixation times (FIT) in a precise format. Despite its growing importance underpinned by the European in vitro diagnostics regulation or broad preanalytical programs by the National Institutes of Health, little is known about its empirical occurrence in biobanked surgical specimen. In several steps, the Tissue Bank Bern achieved a fully informative SPREC code with insights from 10,555 CIT, 4,740 WIT, and 3,121 FIT values. During process optimization according to LEAN six sigma principles, we identified a dual role of the SPREC code as a sample characteristic and a traceable process parameter. With this preanalytical study, we outlined real-life data in a variety of organs with specific differences in WIT, CIT, and FIT values. Furthermore, our FIT data indicate the potential to adapt the SPREC fixation toward concrete paraffin-embedding time points and to extend its categories beyond 72 h due to weekend delays. Additionally, we identified dependencies of preanalytical variables from workload, daytime, and clinics that were actionable with LEAN process management. Thus, streamlined biobanking workflows during the day were significantly resilient to workload peaks, diminishing the turnaround times of native tissue processing (i.e. CIT) from 74.6 to 46.1 min under heavily stressed conditions. In conclusion, there are surgery-specific preanalytics that are surgico-pathologically limited even under process optimization, which might affect biomarker transfer from one entity to another. Beyond sample characteristics, SPREC coding is highly beneficial for tissue banks and Institutes of Pathology to track WIT, CIT, and FIT for process optimization and monitoring measurements.

Related Papers

• → Integrating biomedical and clinical data with BioBank Japan(2022)2 cited
• → Russian National Association of Biobanks and Biobanking Specialists — a tool for integrating Russian biobanks and increasing the efficiency of biomedical research Drapkina O. M.(2020)11 cited
• → Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Perspectives from Managers of Two Distinct Research Biobanks(2015)5 cited
• → Types of Biobanks(2022)3 cited
• → Introduction to Biobanking(2022)