Inter‐rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II)
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2010 papers
Abstract
This study simultaneously assessed the inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Axis I (SCID I) and Axis II disorders (SCID II) in a mixed sample of n = 151 inpatients and outpatients, and non-patient controls. Audiotaped interviews were assessed by independent second raters blind for the first raters' scores and diagnoses. Categorical inter-rater reliability was assessed for 12 Axis I disorders of SCID I, while both categorical and dimensional inter-rater reliability was tested for all Axis II disorders. Results revealed moderate to excellent inter-rater agreement of the Axis I disorders, while most categorically and dimensionally measured personality disorders showed excellent inter-rater agreement.
Related Papers
- → ASPECTS Interobserver Agreement of 100 Investigators from the TENSION Study(2021)70 cited
- → Inpatient diagnostic assessments: 2. Interrater reliability and outcomes of structured vs. unstructured interviews(2001)72 cited
- → Interrater reliability and agreement of performance ratings: A methodological comparison(1996)46 cited
- → Four Multi-Item Interrater Agreement Options: Comparisons and Outcomes(2007)4 cited
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)