Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Real World Evidence: Neither Magic Nor Myth
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2020 papers
Abstract
Compared with drugs from the blockbuster era, recently authorized drugs and those expected in the future present a heterogenous mix of chemicals, biologicals, and cell and gene therapies, a sizable fraction being for rare diseases, and even individualized treatments or individualized combinations. The shift in the nature of products entails secular trends for the definitions of "drugs" and "target population" and for clinical use and evidence generation. We discuss that the lessons learned from evidence generation for 20th century medicines may have limited relevance for 21st century medicines. We explain why the future is not about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) vs. real-world evidence (RWE) but RCTs and RWE-not just for the assessment of safety but also of effectiveness. Finally, we highlight that, in the era of precision medicine, we may not be able to reliably describe some small treatment effects-either by way of RCTs or RWE.
Related Papers
- → What type of clinical evidence is needed to assess medical devices?(2016)42 cited
- → Message to complementary and alternative medicine: evidence is a better friend than power(2001)60 cited
- → Characterizing Evidence with Evidence‐Based Medicine(2008)
- Clinical Study of Acupuncture Based on Evidence-Based Medicine(2010)
- → Evidence-based integrative medicine(2021)