A protocol format for the preparation, registration and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2015 papers

Abstract

Abstract Systematic reviews are an important method to support evidence‐based decisions in healthcare (research). Although not yet as common as clinical systematic reviews, the number of systematic reviews of animal studies has been increasing steadily in recent years. An important method to promote high‐quality systematic reviews is to pre‐specify the review methodology in a protocol, before the conduct of the systematic review itself. In contrast to clinical systematic reviews, a standard protocol format for systematic reviews of animal studies is not yet available. Here, we present a protocol format tailored to the preparation, registration and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies (i.e. systematic reviews of animal experiments studying the efficacy and/or safety of interventions intended for use in human patients). In analogy to the Cochrane review protocol, the format helps authors predefine the methodological approach of their systematic review, from research question to data synthesis. We recommend that authors prospectively complete and agree on the protocol, and register and/or publish it to allow feedback on the proposed methodology and to avoid the introduction of bias during the review process. Opportunities for obtaining feedback, and for registration and publication of review protocols are also discussed.

Related Papers

• → Opening Access to Research(2015)46 cited
• → How Do We Ensure “Read” Institutions Can Still Contribute to a “Publish”-oriented OA Ecosystem?(2021)2 cited
• The discussion on internet publish(2003)
• → Open access plan allows publishing in subscription journals(2020)
• → THE DAILY INTELLIGENCE RESOURCE FOR THE SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING INDUSTRY (Week February 17 to February 23, 2020)(2020)