Assessing adequacy of citizen science datasets for biodiversity monitoring

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2024 papers

Abstract

Tracking the state of biodiversity over time is critical to successful conservation, but conventional monitoring schemes tend to be insufficient to adequately quantify how species' abundances and distributions are changing. One solution to this issue is to leverage data generated by citizen scientists, who collect vast quantities of data at temporal and spatial scales that cannot be matched by most traditional monitoring methods. However, the quality of citizen science data can vary greatly. In this paper, we develop three metrics (inventory completeness, range completeness, spatial bias) to assess the adequacy of spatial observation data. We explore the adequacy of citizen science data at the species level for Australia's terrestrial native birds and then model these metrics against a suite of seven species traits (threat status, taxonomic uniqueness, body mass, average count, range size, species density, and human population density) to identify predictors of data adequacy. We find that citizen science data adequacy for Australian birds is increasing across two of our metrics (inventory completeness and range completeness), but not spatial bias, which has worsened over time. Relationships between the three metrics and seven traits we modelled were variable, with only two traits having consistently significant relationships across the three metrics. Our results suggest that although citizen science data adequacy has generally increased over time, there are still gaps in the spatial adequacy of citizen science for monitoring many Australian birds. Despite these gaps, citizen science can play an important role in biodiversity monitoring by providing valuable baseline data that may be supplemented by information collected through other methods. We believe the metrics presented here constitute an easily applied approach to assessing the utility of citizen science datasets for biodiversity analyses, allowing researchers to identify and prioritise regions or species with lower data adequacy that will benefit most from targeted monitoring efforts.

Related Papers

• → Lessons from lady beetles: accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen‐science programs(2012)291 cited
• → Lessons from citizen science: Assessing volunteer-collected plant phenology data with Mountain Watch(2016)71 cited
• → The Information Content of Biodiversity Datasets is Affected by Patterns of Citizen Science Participation both Between and Within Projects(2019)1 cited
• Study and application of telecom operators system security state baseline(2012)
• → Understanding distributions of invasive mammals in urban environments using remote cameras and citizen science(2019)