Code sharing in ecology and evolution increases citation rates but remains uncommon

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2024 papers

Abstract

Biologists increasingly rely on computer code to collect and analyze their data, reinforcing the importance of published code for transparency, reproducibility, training, and a basis for further work. Here, we conduct a literature review estimating temporal trends in code sharing in ecology and evolution publications since 2010, and test for an influence of code sharing on citation rate. We find that code is rarely published (only 6% of papers), with little improvement over time. We also found there may be incentives to publish code: Publications that share code have tended to be low-impact initially, but accumulate citations faster, compensating for this deficit. Studies that additionally meet other Open Science criteria, open-access publication, or data sharing, have still higher citation rates, with publications meeting all three criteria (code sharing, data sharing, and open access publication) tending to have the most citations and highest rate of citation accumulation.

Related Papers

• → Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?(2021)147 cited
• → Role of Research Data Repositories and Open Data Sharing with Specific Reference to Open Science Framework (OSF)(2023)2 cited
• → Sharing Neurophysiology Data from the Allen Brain Observatory: Lessons Learned(2022)6 cited
• → Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: how open is open?(2020)5 cited
• → Need for Open-Science Policies(2023)