Plant preferential allocation and fungal reward decline with soil phosphorus: implications for mycorrhizal mutualism

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2016 papers

Abstract

Abstract Explaining the persistence of mutualism remains a challenge in ecology and evolutionary biology. The evolutionary stability of arbuscular mycorrhiza, a most widespread and ancient mutualistic association, is particularly intriguing because plants lack apparent mechanisms to prevent cheaters from gaining competitive advantages over cooperators. We developed a triple isotopic labeling method ( 14 C, 32 P, and 33 P) within a split‐root design to measure the exchange of carbon (C) and phosphorus (P) between the host plant and two mycorrhizal partners across a soil P gradient. Host plant preferentially allocated more C to the roots associated with the fungus delivering higher P per unit plant C, and the strength of preferential allocation decreased with increasing soil P availability. The host plant received more P per unit of allocated C from the better fungus and this advantageous exchange rate did not depend upon P availability. As a result, the level of preferential allocation was correlated with the differential delivery of P from the two fungi. Our findings suggest that plant preferential allocation to better mutualists can stabilize mutualisms in environments limiting in the traded resource, but as the availability of this resource increases, plant preferential allocation declines. This environmental dependence of preferential allocation generates predictions of declining levels in relative abundance of mutualistic fungi in high‐resource environments.

Related Papers

• → Current Usage of Symbiosis and Associated Terminology(2012)142 cited
• → Mutualism Persistence and Abandonment during the Evolution of the Mycorrhizal Symbiosis(2016)121 cited
• → Evolving Together: The Biology of Symbiosis, Part 1(2000)57 cited
• → The role of exploitation in the establishment of mutualistic microbial symbioses(2019)44 cited
• → Insect-Fungus Symbiosis: Nutrition, Mutualism and Commensalism(1981)4 cited