The multiple meanings of the gender‐inclusive pronoun hen: Predicting attitudes and use
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2021 papers
Abstract
Abstract The Swedish gender‐inclusive pronoun hen can be used generically (referring to anyone), or specifically (referring to non‐binary gender identities). Three studies tested evaluations and use of hen, and individual‐level predictors. In Study 1 ( N = 2145), specific hen was slightly favoured over generic hen. In Study 2 ( N = 297), hen was more negatively evaluated than binary pronouns, and generic hen was more positively evaluated than specific hen. In Study 3 ( N = 450), hen was less frequently used compared to binary pronouns overall but preferred in generic contexts. Traditionalism mainly predicted attitudes towards generic hen and beliefs about gender, as binary mainly predicted attitudes towards specific hen, although the pattern varied across studies. Because hen was preferred in generic contexts, but not in specific ones, this work has implications for understanding the non‐acceptance of non‐binary gender identities since the traditional binary notion of gender still is strong.
Related Papers
- → René Guénon and Traditionalism(2016)1 cited
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
- → The Tradition as an Alternative to Secular History in French Traditionalism(1992)
- → “ISLAMIC QUESTION” IN THE CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHY OF TRADITIONALISM AND POST-TRADITIONALISM(2009)
- → Anthropomorphism in Islam: The Challenge of Traditionalism (700–1350). By Llivnat Holtzman(2021)