United we stand: Intergroup conflict moderates the intergroup sensitivity effect
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2009 papers
Abstract
Abstract Ingroup members who criticize their group face much less resistance than outgroup members who say the same thing (the intergroup sensitivity effect). In the context of intergroup conflict, however, it was predicted that treatment of ingroup critics would not be so generous. Muslim Indonesians read an extract from an interview in which the speaker criticized Muslims. The comments were attributed to either another Muslim or to a Christian. Before reading the criticism, half of the participants had read an article describing intense conflict between Muslims and Christians in Indonesia, whereas the other half read a neutral article. As predicted, negativity toward the ingroup critic and the ingroup critic's comments increased in the conflict salience condition, to the point that the intergroup sensitivity effect disappeared. However, conflict salience did not have an effect on attributions of motive or on agreement with the message. Implications for our understanding of “patriotic criticism” are discussed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Related Papers
- → Social value orientation moderates ingroup love but not outgroup hate in competitive intergroup conflict(2010)107 cited
- → Implicit Cross-Community Biases Revisited: Evidence for Ingroup Favoritism in the Absence of Outgroup Derogation in Northern Ireland(2016)14 cited
- "Ingroup Love" and "Outgroup Hate" as Motives for Individual Participation in Intergroup Conflict: A New Game Paradigm(2007)
- → Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate(2017)3 cited
- → Outgroup Homogeneity Bias Causes Ingroup Favoritism(2019)