Regulation of the specialized DNA polymerase eta: Revisiting the biological relevance of its PCNA‐ and ubiquitin‐binding motifs

Citations Over TimeTop 21% of 2012 papers

Abstract

Abstract During translesion synthesis (TLS), low‐fidelity polymerases of the Y‐family polymerases bypass DNA damages that block the progression of conventional processive DNA polymerases, thereby allowing the completion of DNA replication. Among the TLS polymerases, DNA polymerase eta (polη) performs nucleotide incorporation past ultraviolet (UV) photoproducts and is deficient in cancer‐prone xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XPV) syndrome. Upon UV irradiation, the DNA sliding clamp PCNA is monoubiquitylated on its conserved Lys‐164. This event is considered to facilitate the TLS process in vivo since polη preferentially interacts with monoubiquitylated PCNA through its ubiquitin‐binding domain (UBZ) as well as its PCNA interacting peptide (PIP)‐box. However, recent observations questioned this model. Therefore, in this study, we re‐examined the relative contribution of the regulatory UBZ and PIP domains of polη in response to UVC. We show that simultaneous invalidation of both motifs confers sensitivity to UVC, sensitization by low concentrations of caffeine, prolonged inhibition of DNA synthesis and persistent S phase checkpoint activation, all characteristic features of XPV cells. While each domain is essential for efficient accumulation of polη in replication factories, mutational inactivation of UBZ or PIP motif only confers a slight sensitivity to UVC indicating that, although informative, polη focus analysis is not a reliable tool to assess the polη's ability to function in TLS in vivo. Taken together, these data indicate that PIP and UBZ motifs are not required for recruitment but for retention of polη at sites of stalled replication forks. We propose that this is a way to ensure that a sufficient amount of the protein is available for its bypass function. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Related Papers

• → A peptide switch regulates DNA polymerase processivity(2003)82 cited
• → Synthetic Activity of Sso DNA Polymerase Y1, an Archaeal DinB-like DNA Polymerase, Is Stimulated by Processivity Factors Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen and Replication Factor C(2001)56 cited
• → Mammalian Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Stimulates the Processivity of Two Wheat Embryo DNA Polymerases(1993)38 cited
• → RETRACTED: Tobacco proliferating cell nuclear antigen binds directly and stimulates both activity and processivity of ddNTP-sensitive mungbean DNA polymerase(2007)9 cited
• → A Single Stranded DNA Binding Protein Isolated from HeLa Cells Facilitates Ni2+ Activation of DNA Polymerases in vitro(1994)2 cited