Assessing data quality in citizen science

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2016 papers

Abstract

Ecological and environmental citizen‐science projects have enormous potential to advance scientific knowledge, influence policy, and guide resource management by producing datasets that would otherwise be infeasible to generate. However, this potential can only be realized if the datasets are of high quality. While scientists are often skeptical of the ability of unpaid volunteers to produce accurate datasets, a growing body of publications clearly shows that diverse types of citizen‐science projects can produce data with accuracy equal to or surpassing that of professionals. Successful projects rely on a suite of methods to boost data accuracy and account for bias, including iterative project development, volunteer training and testing, expert validation, replication across volunteers, and statistical modeling of systematic error. Each citizen‐science dataset should therefore be judged individually, according to project design and application, and not assumed to be substandard simply because volunteers generated it.

Related Papers

• → The Mystery of Skepticism(2019)8 cited
• → Scepticism Comes Alive(2005)21 cited
• → Varieties of skeptical invariantism II(2021)2 cited
• → Ancient Scepticism. By Harald Thorsrud. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2009. Pp. 248 + xvi. ISBN: 978-0-520-26026-9.(2013)
• → Postscript: Scientific Skepticism Resources(2023)