Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2017 papers

Abstract

Despite calls for improved responses to emerging infectious diseases in wildlife, management is seldom considered until a disease has been detected in affected populations. Reactive approaches may limit the potential for control and increase total response costs. An alternative, proactive management framework can identify immediate actions that reduce future impacts even before a disease is detected, and plan subsequent actions that are conditional on disease emergence. We identify four main obstacles to developing proactive management strategies for the newly discovered salamander pathogen Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans ( Bsal ). Given that uncertainty is a hallmark of wildlife disease management and that associated decisions are often complicated by multiple competing objectives, we advocate using decision analysis to create and evaluate trade‐offs between proactive (pre‐emergence) and reactive (post‐emergence) management options. Policy makers and natural resource agency personnel can apply principles from decision analysis to improve strategies for countering emerging infectious diseases.

Related Papers

• → Understanding Visitor Experiences in Captive, Controlled, and Noncaptive Wildlife-Based Tourism Settings(2007)17 cited
• → How do members of the public and wildlife managers understand living with wildlife versus coexisting with wildlife?(2020)4 cited
• It is time to end the debate on introducing exotic wildlife(2005)
• Study on wildlife passage in highway construction(2009)
• Protecting Spirit of Place: Reconstructing Highways, Maintaining Habitat Connectivity, and Respecting Tribal Culture(2017)