Does a health crisis change how we value health?

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2021 papers

Abstract

General population health state values are used in healthcare resource allocation, including health technology assessment. We examine whether UK general population health valuations changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ratings of EQ-5D-5L health states 11111 (no problems), 55555 (extreme problems), and dead were collected in a UK general population survey during the pandemic (April-May 2020) using the 0 = worst imaginable health, 100 = best imaginable health visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). Ratings for 55555 were transformed to a full health = 1, dead = 0 scale. Responses were compared to similar data collected pre-pandemic (2018). After propensity score matching to minimize sample differences, EQ-VAS responses were analyzed using Tobit regressions. On the 0-100 scale, 11111 was rated on average 8.67 points lower, 55555 rated 9.56 points higher, and dead rated 7.45 points lower post-pandemic onset compared to pre-pandemic. On the full health = 1, dead = 0 scale, 55555 values were 0.09 higher post-pandemic onset. There was evidence of differential impacts of COVID-19 by gender, age, and ethnicity, although only age impacted values on the 1-0 scale. COVID-19 may have affected how people value health. It is unknown whether the effect is large enough to have policy relevance, but caution should be taken in assuming pre-COVID-19 values are unchanged.

Related Papers

• → Modeling Food Consumption Decisions as a Two‐Step Process(1988)158 cited
• → Propensity score methods and their application in nephrology research(2011)19 cited
• → Analysis of the Operating Efficiency and Influencing Factors of E－commerce Companies in China: Based on DEA－Tobit Regression Model(2019)
• → Analysis of determinants of dessert café eating out expenditure using a Tobit model(2022)
• → Econometrics and Machine Learning : The comparison of the forecasting powers with Tobit, and Heckit(2022)