Measuring aortic diameter with different MR techniques: Comparison of three‐dimensional (3D) navigated steady‐state free‐precession (SSFP), 3D contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE‐MRA), 2D T2 black blood, and 2D cine SSFP
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging2009Vol. 31(1), pp. 177–184
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2009 papers
Silke Potthast, Lee M. Mitsumori, Luana Stanescu, Michael L. Richardson, Kelley R. Branch, Theodore J. Dubinsky, Jeffrey H. Maki
Abstract
If diameter measurements are the main clinical concern, 3D-nav SSFP appears to be the best choice, as it has a sharp edge profile, is easy to acquire and postprocess, and shows very good interobserver correlation.
Related Papers
- → The Ascending Aorta(1994)151 cited
- → Biomechanical analysis of wrapping of the moderately dilated ascending aorta(2015)23 cited
- Clamping of the atherosclerotic ascending aorta during coronary artery bypass operations. Its cost in strokes.(1992)
- → Clamping of the atherosclerotic ascending aorta during coronary artery bypass operations(1992)62 cited
- Wash out technique for proximal anastomosis in atherosclerotic ascending aorta.(1998)