Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility
Citations Over Time
Abstract
This research was conducted to assess how guilt appeals operate in soliciting charitable donations. It was hypothesized that a sense of responsibility would enhance the effectiveness of charitable guilt appeals, thus leading to larger charitable donations. It was also hypothesized that the presence of others would make salient a prosocial norm, thus increasing a sense of responsibility to help. Two laboratory experiments were conducted to test these hypotheses. The effect of guilt on charitable-donation intention and actual donations was mediated by a sense of responsibility. Additionally, the presence of others enhanced the sense of responsibility to behave prosocially. These findings have implications for the design of charitable-donation campaigns. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Related Papers
- → Altruism and Helping: The Evolution of a Field: The 2008 Cooley-Mead Presentation1(2009)48 cited
- → The double dividend of social information in charitable giving: Evidence from a framed field experiment(2023)4 cited
- HOW MUCH TO DONATE: THE EFFECT OF DONORS' NATURE ON ATTITUDE TOWARD DONATIONS AND DONATION VALUE(2015)
- → Altruism and Prosocial Behavior(2017)3 cited
- Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving(2013)