Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2017 papers

Abstract

Available comparison studies suggest that PET-AS algorithms relying on advanced image analysis paradigms provide generally more accurate segmentation than approaches based on PET activity thresholds, particularly for realistic configurations. However, this may not be the case for simple shape lesions in situations with a narrower range of parameters, where simpler methods may also perform well. Recent algorithms which employ some type of consensus or automatic selection between several PET-AS methods have potential to overcome the limitations of the individual methods when appropriately trained. In either case, accuracy evaluation is required for each different PET scanner and scanning and image reconstruction protocol. For the simpler, less robust approaches, adaptation to scanning conditions, tumor type, and tumor location by optimization of parameters is necessary. The results from the method evaluation stage can be used to estimate the contouring uncertainty. All PET-AS contours should be critically verified by a physician. A standard test, i.e., a benchmark dedicated to evaluating both existing and future PET-AS algorithms needs to be designed, to aid clinicians in evaluating and selecting PET-AS algorithms and to establish performance limits for their acceptance for clinical use. The initial steps toward designing and building such a standard are undertaken by the task group members.

Related Papers

• → Physician-Friendly Machine Learning: A Case Study with Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction(2019)71 cited
• → The Challenges of Current Segmentation Models(2012)
• → UCP-Net: Unstructured Contour Points for Instance Segmentation(2021)
• → Interactive Segmentation for COVID-19 Infection Quantification on Longitudinal CT scans(2021)
• → Conditional Matting For Post-Segmentation Refinement Segment Anything Model(2023)