Evaluation of segmentation methods on head and neck CT: Auto‐segmentation challenge 2015
Medical Physics2017Vol. 44(5), pp. 2020–2036
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2017 papers
Patrik Raudaschl, Paolo Zaffino, G Sharp, Maria Francesca Spadea, Antong Chen, Benoît M. Dawant, Thomas Albrecht, Tobias Gass, Christoph Langguth, Marcel Lüthi, Florian Jung, Oliver Knapp, Stefan Wesarg, Richard Mannion‐Haworth, M.A. Bowes, Annaliese Ashman, Gwenael Guillard, Alan Brett, G.R. Vincent, Mauricio Orbes‐Arteaga, David Cárdenas‐Peña, G. Castellanos-Domínguez, Nava Aghdasi, Yangming Li, Angelique Berens, Kris S. Moe, Blake Hannaford, Rainer Schubert, Karl Fritscher
Abstract
The Head and Neck Auto-Segmentation Challenge 2015 was a good opportunity to assess the current state-of-the-art in segmentation of organs at risk for radiotherapy treatment. Participating teams had the possibility to compare their approaches to other methods under unbiased and standardized circumstances. The results demonstrate a clear tendency toward more general purpose and fewer structure-specific segmentation algorithms.
Related Papers
- → A comprehensive survey on segmentation techniques for retinal vessel segmentation(2023)39 cited
- → The Challenges of Current Segmentation Models(2012)
- → Exploring Cycle Consistency Learning in Interactive Volume Segmentation(2023)
- → Interactive Segmentation for COVID-19 Infection Quantification on Longitudinal CT scans(2021)
- → Conditional Matting For Post-Segmentation Refinement Segment Anything Model(2023)