Evaluation of machine log files/MC‐based treatment planning and delivery QA as compared to ArcCHECK QA
Medical Physics2018Vol. 45(7), pp. 2864–2874
Citations Over TimeTop 16% of 2018 papers
Carl Stanhope, Douglas G. Drake, Jian Liang, M. Alber, Matthias Söhn, Charbel Habib, Virgil Willcut, Di Yan
Abstract
Reconstructing every log file sample with no increase in computational cost, MC-based LF QA is faster and more accurate than CS-based LF QA. Offering similar dosimetric accuracy compared to AC measurement, MC-based log files can be used for treatment planning QA.
Related Papers
- → Application of holographic display in radiotherapy treatment planning II: a multi‐institutional study(2009)18 cited
- → 3D treatment planning system—Pinnacle system(2018)17 cited
- → SU‐F‐T‐440: The Feasibility Research of Checking Cervical Cancer IMRT Pre‐ Treatment Dose Verification by Automated Treatment Planning Verification System(2016)1 cited
- → SU-E-J-254: Utility of Pinnacle Dynamic Planning Module Utilizing Deformable Image Registration in Adaptive Radiotherapy(2014)
- → SU‐E‐T‐439: First Experience of Three Dimensional Conformai Radiotherapy (3DCRT) Planning with Helical Tomotherapy(2012)