Comparative evaluation of autocontouring in clinical practice: A practical method using the Turing test
Medical Physics2018Vol. 45(11), pp. 5105–5115
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2018 papers
Mark J. Gooding, Annamarie J. Smith, Maira Tariq, Paul Aljabar, Devis Peressutti, J. van der Stoep, Bart Reymen, Daisy Emans, Djoya Hattu, Judith van Loon, Maud de Rooy, Rinus Wanders, Stéphanie Peeters, Tim Lustberg, Johan van Soest, André Dekker, Wouter van Elmpt
Abstract
A better correspondence with time saving was observed for the misclassification rate than the quantitative contour measures explored. From this, we conclude that the inability to accurately judge the source of a contour indicates a reduced need for editing and therefore a greater time saving overall. Hence, task-based assessments of contouring performance may be considered as an additional way of evaluating the clinical utility of autosegmentation methods.
Related Papers
- → Biomedical imaging modalities: a tutorial(1995)78 cited
- → A review of automatic lung tumour segmentation in the era of 4DCT(2019)20 cited
- → Contouring structures for 3-dimensional treatment planning(1992)25 cited
- → Medical Physics: Some Recollections in Diagnostic X-ray Imaging and Therapeutic Radiology(2000)8 cited
- → MO‐G‐9A‐01: Imaging Refresher for Standard of Care Radiation Therapy(2014)