Intercomparison of MR‐informed PET image reconstruction methods
Medical Physics2019Vol. 46(11), pp. 5055–5074
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2019 papers
James Bland, Abolfazl Mehranian, Martín A. Belzunce, Sam Ellis, Casper da Costa‐Luis, Colm J. McGinnity, Alexander Hammers, Andrew J. Reader
Abstract
For the reconstruction of noisy data, multiple MR-informed methods produce favorable whole brain vs PET-unique region trade-off in terms of the image quality metrics of SSIM and NRMSE, comfortably outperforming the whole image denoising of postsmoothed MLEM.
Related Papers
- → Fast EM-like methods for maximum "a posteriori" estimates in emission tomography(2001)174 cited
- → MAP decoding in channels with memory(2000)20 cited
- → Introduction of ordered subsets algorithm to maximum a posteriori expectation maximization method(2002)4 cited
- → Accelerated iterative reconstruction based on the maximum a posteriori expectation maximization(1993)2 cited
- → MAP decoding using the EM algorithm(2003)1 cited