Clinical acceptability of fully automated external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer with three different beam delivery techniques
Medical Physics2022Vol. 49(9), pp. 5742–5751
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2022 papers
Dong Joo Rhee, Anuja Jhingran, Kai Huang, Tucker Netherton, Nazia Fakie, Ingrid White, Alicia Sherriff, Carlos Cárdenas, Lifei Zhang, Surendra Prajapati, Stephen F. Kry, Beth M. Beadle, William V. Shaw, Frederika O’Reilly, Jeannette Parkes, Hester Burger, Chris Trauernicht, Hannah Simonds, Laurence E. Court
Abstract
Approximately, 90% of the automatically generated plans were clinically acceptable for all three planning techniques. This fully automated planning system has been implemented into the radiation planning assistant for further testing in resource-constrained radiotherapy departments in low- and middle-income countries.
Related Papers
- → Retrospective Validation and Clinical Implementation of Automated Contouring of Organs at Risk in the Head and Neck: A Step Toward Automated Radiation Treatment Planning for Low- and Middle-Income Countries(2018)56 cited
- → An investigation into positron emission tomography contouring methods across two treatment planning systems(2012)1 cited
- → Deformable Contour Propagation of Organs at Risk in Adaptive Head and Neck Radiation Therapy(2014)
- → (S036) Resident Supervision in Contouring, Treatment Planning, and Plan Evaluation: A Nationwide Survey of Radiation Oncology Residents(2017)
- → Utility of Structure Propagation in CT-based Cervical Brachytherapy Planning(2018)