Indicators of mental disorders in UK Biobank—A comparison of approaches
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research2019Vol. 28(3), pp. e1796–e1796
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2019 papers
Katrina A. S. Davis, Breda Cullen, Mark J. Adams, Anamaria Brăilean, Gerome Breen, Jonathan R. I. Coleman, Alex Dregan, Helena Gaspar, Christopher Hübel, William Lee, Andrew M. McIntosh, John Nolan, Robert Pearsall, Matthew Hotopf
Abstract
Our results confirm that ascertainment of mental disorder diagnosis in large cohorts such as UK Biobank is complex. There may not be one method of classification that is right for all circumstances, but an informed and transparent use of outcome measure(s) to suit each research question will maximise the potential of UK Biobank and other resources for mental health research.
Related Papers
- → The Significance of Biobanking in the Sustainability of Biomedical Research: A Review(2020)17 cited
- → Russian National Association of Biobanks and Biobanking Specialists — a tool for integrating Russian biobanks and increasing the efficiency of biomedical research Drapkina O. M.(2020)11 cited
- → The Utility of Collaborative Biobanks for Cardiovascular Research(2011)4 cited
- → Types of Biobanks(2022)3 cited
- → MGA Biobank - A Multispecialistic Project Biobank in Slovakia(2023)