Perceptions on Academic Rhinologist Compensation Models: An ARS Survey

Abstract

Although a plurality of respondents (39%) believed that salaried models are most conducive to balancing academic and clinical responsibilities, survey findings highlight a dissonance. Respondents under collections-based models were more likely to feel adequately supported (64.71%) compared to those under salaried or RVU-based models. This suggests that although many perceive salaried models as ideal for balance, collections-based models may better address financial and structural needs, emphasizing the importance of developing flexible, tailored compensation structures that align with individual and institutional goals while fostering academic productivity.

Related Papers

• → Dealing with dissonance: A review of cognitive dissonance reduction(2017)316 cited
• "After I Had Made the Decision, I...: " Toward a Scale to Measure Cognitive Dissonance(1998)
• Cognitive Dissonance Identification in the Institutional Setting of the Academic Library(2004)
• → Cognitive dissonance: its role in decision making(2020)2 cited
• → RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AND ACHIEVEMENT IN MATHEMATICS AMONG HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS(2017)2 cited