Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non‐invasive prenatal testing. Part I—clinical impact
Prenatal Diagnosis2016Vol. 36(12), pp. 1083–1090
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2016 papers
Dick Oepkes, Godelieve C.M.L. Page‐Christiaens, Caroline J. Bax, Mireille N. Bekker, Catia M. Bilardo, Elles M. J. Boon, G. Heleen Schuring‐Blom, A. Coumans, Brigitte H. W. Faas, Robert‐Jan H. Galjaard, Attie T. J. I. Go, Lidewij Henneman, Merryn Macville, Eva Pajkrt, Ron F. Suijkerbuijk, Karin Huijsdens–van Amsterdam, Diane Van Opstal, E. J. T. Verweij, Marjan M. Weiss, Erik A. Sistermans
Abstract
Introduction of NIPT in the Dutch National healthcare-funded Prenatal Screening Program resulted in high uptake and a vast reduction of invasive testing. Our study supports offering NIPT to pregnant women at increased risk for fetal trisomy. © 2016 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2016 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Related Papers
- → DETECTING CHANGES IN NON‐SIMULATED EVENTS USING PARTIAL INTERVAL RECORDING AND MOMENTARY TIME SAMPLING: EVALUATING FALSE POSITIVES, FALSE NEGATIVES, AND TRENDING(2012)14 cited
- → 29 False positives and false negatives in genome scans(2001)46 cited
- → Trisomy X in three children(1968)19 cited
- Evaluation and Tuning Test of False Positive and False Negative using Static Analysis Non-Linear Method in JDBC(2014)
- → Eliminating False Positives of Hough Transform with Constructive Testing in Line Detection(2021)