Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology
European Journal of Personality2013Vol. 27(2), pp. 108–119
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2013 papers
Jens B. Asendorpf, Mark Conner, Filip De Fruyt, Jan De Houwer, Jaap J. A. Denissen, Klaus Fiedler, Susann Fiedler, David C. Funder, Reinhold Kliegl, Brian A. Nosek, Marco Perugini, Brent W. Roberts, Manfred Schmitt, Marcel A. G. van Aken, Hannelore Weber, Jelte M. Wicherts
Abstract
Replicability of findings is at the heart of any empirical science. The aim of this article is to move the current replicability debate in psychology towards concrete recommendations for improvement. We focus on research practices but also offer guidelines for reviewers, editors, journal management, teachers, granting institutions, and university promotion committees, highlighting some of the emerging and existing practical solutions that can facilitate implementation of these recommendations. The challenges for improving replicability in psychological science are systemic. Improvement can occur only if changes are made at many levels of practice, evaluation, and reward. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Related Papers
- → Digital Traces: New Data, Resources, and Tools for Psychological-Science Research(2019)39 cited
- → Consciousness and psychological science(1999)5 cited
- → Research on Research: A Meta-Scientific Study of Problems and Solutions in Psychological Science(2018)1 cited
- → Psychological Science Accelerator: A Promising Resource for Clinical Psychological Science(2020)
- → History of Psychological Thought. The Object of Research in Psychological Science(2021)