Effects and moderators of psychosocial interventions on quality of life, and emotional and social function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta‐analysis of 22 RCTs
Psycho-Oncology2018Vol. 27(4), pp. 1150–1161
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2018 papers
Joeri Kalter, Irma M. Verdonck‐de Leeuw, Maike G. Sweegers, Neil K. Aaronson, Paul B. Jacobsen, Robert U. Newton, Kerry S. Courneya, Joanne F. Aitken, Jo Armes, Cecilia Arving, Liesbeth Boersma, Annemarie Braamse, Yvonne Brandberg, Suzanne K. Chambers, Joost Dekker, Kathleen Ell, Robert J. Ferguson, Marieke Gielissen, Bengt Glimelius, Martine M. Goedendorp, Kristi D. Graves, Sue P. Heiney, Robert Horne, Myra S. Hunter, Bodil Johansson, Merel Kimman, Hans Knoop, Karen Meneses, Laurel Northouse, Hester S. A. Oldenburg, Judith B. Prins, Josée Savard, Marc van Beurden, Sanne W. van den Berg, Johannes Brug, Laurien M. Buffart
Abstract
PSI significantly improved QoL, EF, and SF, with small overall effects. However, the effects differed by several demographic, clinical, personal, and intervention-related characteristics. Our study highlights the beneficial effects of coping skills training in patients treated with chemotherapy, the importance of targeted interventions, and the need of developing interventions tailored to the specific needs of elderly patients.
Related Papers
- → Reconsidering Self-Moderation(2020)129 cited
- → Expatriates’ interaction adjustment: the direct and moderator effects of culture of origin(2004)117 cited
- → How do people define moderation?(2016)15 cited
- → The Role of Higher Education Integrated with Religious Moderation(2022)1 cited
- How Does Intensity of Social Network Sites Use Moderate Cybervictimization? Understanding the Factors and Conditions Using an R-Based Tool for Probing Moderation Effects(2015)