Comparison of sequence and structure alignments for protein domains

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2002 papers

Abstract

Profile search methods based on protein domain alignments have proven to be useful tools in comparative sequence analysis. Domain alignments used by currently available search methods have been computed by sequence comparison. With the growth of the protein structure database, however, alignments of many domain pairs have also been computed by structure comparison. Here, we examine the extent to which information from these two sources agrees. We measure agreement with respect to identification of homologous regions in each protein, that is, with respect to the location of domain boundaries. We also measure agreement with respect to identification of homologous residue sites by comparing alignments and assessing the accuracy of the molecular models they predict. We find that domain alignments in publicly available collections based on sequence and structure comparison are largely consistent. However, the homologous regions identified by sequence comparison are often shorter than those identified by 3D structure comparison. In addition, when overall sequence similarity is low alignments from sequence comparison produce less accurate molecular models, suggesting that they less accurately identify homologous sites. These observations suggest that structure comparison results might be used to improve the overall accuracy of domain alignment collections and the performance of profile search methods based on them.

Related Papers

• → Prediction of amino acid sequence from structure(2000)88 cited
• → Prediction of Protein Structure by Evaluation of Sequence-structure Fitness(1993)144 cited
• → Protein sequence threading: Averaging over structures(2002)10 cited
• → Addressing the issue of sequence-to-structure alignments in comparative modeling of CASP3 target proteins(1999)16 cited
• Protein structure prediction: sequence to structure alignment generation and atomic potential development(2005)