Fold recognition by concurrent use of solvent accessibility and residue depth
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2007 papers
Abstract
Recognizing the structural similarity without significant sequence identity (called fold recognition) is the key for bridging the gap between the number of known protein sequences and the number of structures solved. Previously, we developed a fold-recognition method called SP(3) which combines sequence-derived sequence profiles, secondary-structure profiles and residue-depth dependent, structure-derived sequence profiles. The use of residue-depth-dependent profiles makes SP(3) one of the best automatic predictors in CASP 6. Because residue depth (RD) and solvent accessible surface area (solvent accessibility) are complementary in describing the exposure of a residue to solvent, we test whether or not incorporation of solvent-accessibility profiles into SP(3) could further increase the accuracy of fold recognition. The resulting method, called SP(4), was tested in SALIGN benchmark for alignment accuracy and Lindahl, LiveBench 8 and CASP7 blind prediction for fold recognition sensitivity and model-structure accuracy. For remote homologs, SP(4) is found to consistently improve over SP(3) in the accuracy of sequence alignment and predicted structural models as well as in the sensitivity of fold recognition. Our result suggests that RD and solvent accessibility can be used concurrently for improving the accuracy and sensitivity of fold recognition. The SP(4) server and its local usage package are available on http://sparks.informatics.iupui.edu/SP4.
Related Papers
- → Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIII(2019)538 cited
- → Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIV(2021)521 cited
- → A Historical Perspective of Template-Based Protein Structure Prediction(2008)28 cited
- → Predicting protein three-dimensional structure(1999)81 cited
- → A Multi-Template Combination Algorithm for Protein Model Refinement(2014)