Second antibody modeling assessment (AMA‐II)
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2014 papers
Abstract
To assess the state of the art in antibody 3D modeling, 11 unpublished high-resolution x-ray Fab crystal structures from diverse species and covering a wide range of antigen-binding site conformations were used as a benchmark to compare Fv models generated by seven structure prediction methodologies. The participants included: Accerlys Inc, Chemical Computer Group (CCG), Schrodinger, Jeff Gray's lab at John Hopkins University, Macromoltek, Astellas Pharma/Osaka University and Prediction of ImmunoGlobulin Structure (PIGS). The sequences of benchmark structures were submitted to the modelers and PIGS, and a set of models were generated for each structure. We provide here an overview of the organization, participants and main results of this second antibody modeling assessment (AMA-II). Also, we compare the results with the first antibody assessment published in this journal (Almagro et al., 2011;79:3050).
Related Papers
- → A Benchmark Test Structure for Experimental Dynamic Substructuring(2011)9 cited
- → Solutions to the Third Benchmark Control Problem(1991)3 cited
- Theoretical Analysis of the Benchmark for Choosing Manipulative Instruments of Monetary Policies(2009)
- → Exploring disk performance benchmarks(2017)
- → Support Structure Performance Benchmark(2023)