Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2007 papers

Abstract

Observational epidemiological studies suffer from many potential biases, from confounding and from reverse causation, and this limits their ability to robustly identify causal associations. Several high-profile situations exist in which randomized controlled trials of precisely the same intervention that has been examined in observational studies have produced markedly different findings. In other observational sciences, the use of instrumental variable (IV) approaches has been one approach to strengthening causal inferences in non-experimental situations. The use of germline genetic variants that proxy for environmentally modifiable exposures as instruments for these exposures is one form of IV analysis that can be implemented within observational epidemiological studies. The method has been referred to as 'Mendelian randomization', and can be considered as analogous to randomized controlled trials. This paper outlines Mendelian randomization, draws parallels with IV methods, provides examples of implementation of the approach and discusses limitations of the approach and some methods for dealing with these.

Related Papers

• → Bayesian methods for instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments (‘Mendelian randomization’): example with urate transporter SLC2A9 as an instrumental variable for effect of urate levels on metabolic syndrome(2010)47 cited
• → On the use of kernel machines for Mendelian randomization(2017)9 cited
• → Re: "Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies: Approaches For Evaluating The Instrumental Variable Assumptions"(2012)9 cited
• → Re: "Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies: Approaches For Evaluating The Instrumental Variable Assumptions"(2012)4 cited
• → Constrained Instruments and their Application to Mendelian Randomization with Pleiotropy(2017)7 cited